The Zen Paradox

(a short essay)

Eastern philosophies have always concerned themselves with paradox. From Buddhism, to Zen, to Taoism, to Hinduism, the perception of paradox lies outside of mere observation and encompasses almost a loose dogma in which paradox becomes a sort of “WWJD” for life’s dilemmas. Ethical questions are answered with contradictions, and absurdity becomes the basis for understanding reason. A question might be answered with a paradox or enigma to get the asker to un-think the initial question; a casual undoing of thought. One of the most well-known examples of this was when a monk asked Dongshan Shouchu – an ancient Chinese Zen teacher – what the Buddha was. Dongshan replied, “This flax weighs three pounds.” However, with the emphasis of paradox and contradiction in Eastern philosophy, these philosophies have become the embodiment of paradox themselves. Here is why:

Although several differences exist between these Eastern schools of philosophical thought, there is an underlying cement that binds them all together. This is the notion of “oneness.” Nearly every Eastern philosophy pushes this idea that individuality and separateness are illusions; that the universe – a word derived from the Old Latin “unus,” meaning ‘one’ – is a singular organism. As Alan Watts put it, “For ‘you’ is the universe looking at itself from billions of points of view, points that come and go so that the vision is forever new.” Or Aleister Crowley, “The universe is the Practical Joke of the General at the expense of the Particular.”

Many Eastern philosophies pave a spiritual path to enlightenment. This is especially true in the case of Zen Buddhism. If one fully realizes the teachings of the creed, he or she can become “enlightened.” Enlightenment is to be one of the highest attainments of life’s journey. This sets up a very obvious dichotomy between the enlightened and the unenlightened.

Now here is the paradox: Why concern yourself with the individual enlightenment of people if you believe the universe and everything in it to be one? If everything in existence is the embodiment of one breath, one process that works as a whole and doesn’t contain individual pieces, doesn’t the preoccupation with getting the illusionary pieces of this whole realize their innate reality sound ridiculous? If everything is one, then getting people to realize this becomes arbitrary, because that would be to define people as individual, the very concept you attempt to dispel. Thus, all philosophies that teach the “oneness” of the universe contradict themselves by supposing that there are individuals that need to be taught.

Disclaimer: I do not intend to claim that Eastern philosophies are ‘wrong’ in their beliefs. As an old Taoist poet once said, “the conflict between right and wrong is the sickness of the mind.”

About cognifeeder

My name is Josh. I like to think about things. I also like to write (albeit, “type” might be a more appropriate verb). Sometimes, I can muster these two likes into an enthralling synergy of self-expression. Sometimes not. Cognifeeder was a word I made up in this poem. To me, a “Cognifeeder” is any bit of learned information. A Cognifeeder is a piece of culture, something learned that contributes to one's map of reality. The world is littered with Cognifeeders. Take them lightly. When I’m not blogging, I run Sonata, a digital marketing and SEO agency based in Aledo, Texas.

Posted on November 22, 2012, in essay, philosophy and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. great thought. i love the article

  2. There is no real dichotomy or dualism in the idea that our enlightenment is already realized – most often we simply don’t realize it. As Dogen said, no being ever fails to reach his full completion…the bag if flax us really it…

  3. That’s the thing, the declaration of all being one implies wisdom of one individual, who must at least seem to exist on another plane of living.

    • I think my point, inelegantly stated, was that what appears as a paradox is actually central to the practice. So – true, yes. Yet no paradox.

      • Is there difference between “appears as a paradox” and being paradox? I enjoy the Eastern philosophies very much, and one of my favorite aspects is their dismissal of Aristotelian logic and ridged reasoning, favoring instead a playfully intuitive cycle of thought. The paradox is not something to be abhorred yet embraced.

      • I don’t know, that’s an interesting question. My use of “appears” might have been sloppy language more than anything else. But as to embracing the paradox, one feels the paradox intuitively and faces it – and the more one does this the more they seem to dissolve.

  4. Every individual cell in my body
    is part of the Unity that is Me
    but they only ever realise this
    when the endorphines are released.

  5. Haven’t there been greek philosophers trying to show, that world is an illusion? I think, the dichotomy paradox (greek philosopher: Zeno) at least shows, that our notion of “counting” or “dividing” might be erroneous, and that our brain – used to be trained in a finite world – is of no use as soon as it comes to infinity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: